AI Rankings · game development studios and publishers · Australia
Minds at Play, according to AI (October 2026)
When a buyer in Australia asked ChatGPT, Gemini or Google AI Mode for game development studios and publishers, Minds at Play came up in 3 of 180 answers. That puts it #54 of the 240 companies AI named in Australia.
Every time it came up, AI recommended it rather than just mentioning it.
- 60 buyer questions
- 180 answers read
- 3 engines
Where you stand
Your totals across all 3 engines first, then the same numbers engine by engine. Rank is your place among the companies that engine named in Australia. Mention rate is the share of that engine’s answers that name you. Recommendation rate is the share of your mentions where you are put forward as a recommendation, not just named. Average position is the place you take in an answer that names you, 1 means first. Questions you appear in is how many of the 60 buyer questions named you at least once.
| Engine | Rank | Mention rate | Recommendation rate | Average position | Questions you appear in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All 3 engines | #54of 240 | 2% | 100% | 4.7 | 2 of 60 |
 ChatGPT | 0 of 60 | ||||
 Gemini | #47of 89 | 2% | 100% | 4.0 | 1 of 60 |
 Google AI Mode | #32of 103 | 3% | 100% | 5.0 | 2 of 60 |
Google AI Mode names Minds at Play most often, Gemini least. PlaySide Studios leads on ChatGPT. Chaos Theory Games leads on Gemini. Blowfish Studios leads on Google AI Mode.
Named instead of you
The leader, the three named right above you, and you. Share of answers that name each one, overall and on each engine.
| Rank | company | Mention rate | ChatGPT | Gemini | Google AI Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PlaySide Studios47 answers ahead of you | 28% | 28% | 28% | 27% |
| 51 | GUCKlevel with you | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% |
| 52 | Infinite Game Studiolevel with you | 2% | 5% | ||
| 53 | Krome Studioslevel with you | 2% | 5% | ||
| 54 | Minds at Playyou | 2% | 2% | 3% |
Krome Studios is level with you, Monkey Stack level with you.
See, question by question, who took the spot →In AI’s own words
How the engines described Minds at Play when they named it, word for word, from the October 2026 answers.
…collecting professional-grade player feedback for developers: Minds at Play (Play Test Lab): Running a structured, highly regarded Play Test Lab, this Australian organization coordinates…
Running a structured, highly regarded Play Test Lab, this Australian organization coordinates structured playtests focused on inclusive design, market readiness, and accessibility.
They connect indie and commercial developers with a diverse panel of over 600 participants (with a strong emphasis on neurodiverse perspectives) to deliver actionable feedback, quantitative engagement metrics, and structured reporting.
AI states 5 facts about Minds at Play
In the October 2026 answers, AI describes your company in 5 statements: 5 about the service.
Findrix checks each one against your own facts, statement by statement, and writes the correction email for you.
Check all 5 in Findrix →What to do with this report
Get named where you are not
Minds at Play appeared in 2 of the 60 buyer questions. Findrix runs the other 58 for you and shows who AI names there instead, and which sites got them the spot.
Fix what AI gets wrong
AI states 5 facts about Minds at Play. Findrix puts each one next to your own facts and writes the correction email for you to send.
Watch it move
In your inbox: a report after every scan and a monthly PDF for your team. An email when a fix worked or a rival overtakes you, and right away if your site blocks AI bots or goes down.
← Back to Game development studios and publishers in AustraliaRequest a correction or removal
Get Minds at Play recommended by AISee what AI says about your company, who it names instead, and what to change so it names you.