AI Rankings · learning management and edtech software · Australia
Induct For Work, according to AI (October 2026)
When a buyer in Australia asked ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google AI Mode for learning management and edtech software, Induct For Work came up in 10 of 180 answers. That puts it #16 of the 233 companies AI named in Australia.
Every time it came up, AI recommended it rather than just mentioning it.
- 60 buyer questions
- 180 answers read
- 3 engines
Where you stand
Your totals across all 3 engines first, then the same numbers engine by engine. Rank is your place among the companies that engine named in Australia. Mention rate is the share of that engine’s answers that name you. Recommendation rate is the share of your mentions where you are put forward as a recommendation, not just named. Average position is the place you take in an answer that names you, 1 means first. Questions you appear in is how many of the 60 buyer questions named you at least once.
| Engine | Rank | Mention rate | Recommendation rate | Average position | Questions you appear in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All 3 engines | #16of 233 | 6% | 100% | 3.1 | 7 of 60 |
| #6of 117 | 12% | 100% | 3.9 | 7 of 60 | |
| #36of 126 | 2% | 100% | 2.0 | 1 of 60 | |
| #26of 89 | 3% | 100% | 1.0 | 2 of 60 |
ChatGPT names Induct For Work most often, Perplexity least. aXcelerate leads on ChatGPT. Tribal Habits leads on Perplexity. Moodle leads on Google AI Mode.
Named instead of you
The leader, the three named right above you, and you. Share of answers that name each one, overall and on each engine.
| Rank | company | Mention rate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moodle22 answers ahead of you | 18% | 12% | 10% | 32% |
| 13 | WorkPlan Learning2 answers ahead of you | 7% | 15% | 5% | |
| 14 | Thinkific1 answer ahead of you | 6% | 7% | 2% | 10% |
| 15 | Absorb LMSlevel with you | 6% | 3% | 13% | |
| 16 | Induct For Workyou | 6% | 12% | 2% | 3% |
Absorb LMS is level with you, Cornerstone OnDemand 1 behind.
See, question by question, who took the spot →In AI’s own words
How the engines described Induct For Work when they named it, word for word, from the October 2026 answers.
…with requirements assignable by role, team or location. [4] Induct For Work — focused specifically on online inductions, with remote/device-independent access, automated invitations and progress…
focused specifically on online inductions, with remote/device-independent access, automated invitations and progress tracking.
Contractors can be invited to training, complete forms/signatures and quizzes, receive certificates, and have licences/certificates tracked for expiry.
AI states 15 facts about Induct For Work
In the October 2026 answers, AI describes your company in 15 statements: 10 about the service, 4 about prices and 1 about other things.
Findrix checks each one against your own facts, statement by statement, and writes the correction email for you.
Check all 15 in Findrix →What to do with this report
Get named where you are not
Induct For Work appeared in 7 of the 60 buyer questions. Findrix runs the other 53 for you and shows who AI names there instead, and which sites got them the spot.
Fix what AI gets wrong
AI states 15 facts about Induct For Work. Findrix puts each one next to your own facts and writes the correction email for you to send.
Watch it move
In your inbox: a report after every scan and a monthly PDF for your team. An email when a fix worked or a rival overtakes you, and right away if your site blocks AI bots or goes down.
← Back to learning management and edtech software in AustraliaRequest a correction or removal
Get Induct For Work recommended by AISee what AI says about your company, who it names instead, and what to change so it names you.
