AI Rankings · low-code and no-code application development platforms · Australia
FlutterFlow, according to AI (October 2026)
When a buyer in Australia asked ChatGPT, Gemini or Google AI Mode for low-code and no-code application development platforms, FlutterFlow came up in 29 of 180 answers. That puts it #10 of the 150 companies AI named in Australia.
In 25 of those 29 answers AI recommended it. In the other 4 it only mentioned it.
- 60 buyer questions
- 180 answers read
- 3 engines
Where you stand
Your totals across all 3 engines first, then the same numbers engine by engine. Rank is your place among the companies that engine named in Australia. Mention rate is the share of that engine’s answers that name you. Recommendation rate is the share of your mentions where you are put forward as a recommendation, not just named. Average position is the place you take in an answer that names you, 1 means first. Questions you appear in is how many of the 60 buyer questions named you at least once.
| Engine | Rank | Mention rate | Recommendation rate | Average position | Questions you appear in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All 3 engines | #10of 150 | 16% | 86% | 3.9 | 16 of 60 |
 ChatGPT | #13of 97 | 13% | 88% | 4.3 | 8 of 60 |
 Gemini | #9of 82 | 23% | 86% | 4.3 | 14 of 60 |
 Google AI Mode | #12of 64 | 12% | 86% | 2.7 | 7 of 60 |
Gemini names FlutterFlow most often, Google AI Mode least. Microsoft Power Apps leads on all 3 engines.
Named instead of you
The leader, the three named right above you, and you. Share of answers that name each one, overall and on each engine.
| Rank | company | Mention rate | ChatGPT | Gemini | Google AI Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Power Apps57 answers ahead of you | 48% | 47% | 48% | 48% |
| 7 | Mendix15 answers ahead of you | 24% | 28% | 23% | 22% |
| 8 | Softr15 answers ahead of you | 24% | 25% | 28% | 20% |
| 9 | AppSheet13 answers ahead of you | 23% | 28% | 20% | 22% |
| 10 | FlutterFlowyou | 16% | 13% | 23% | 12% |
AppSheet is 13 answers ahead of you, Zoho Creator 4 behind.
See, question by question, who took the spot →In AI’s own words
How the engines described FlutterFlow when they named it, word for word, from the October 2026 answers.
Thunkable or FlutterFlow: If you need a true native mobile app that you can submit directly to the Apple App Store and Google Play Store with custom device features (like push notifications,…
Thunkable uses a visual drag-and-drop block system, while FlutterFlow is a bit more advanced but heavily integrated with AI generation tools.
FlutterFlow lets you build visually while giving you full control over the code.
AI states 53 facts about FlutterFlow
In the October 2026 answers, AI describes your company in 53 statements: 42 about the service, 9 about prices and 2 about other things.
Findrix checks each one against your own facts, statement by statement, and writes the correction email for you.
Check all 53 in Findrix →What to do with this report
Get named where you are not
FlutterFlow appeared in 16 of the 60 buyer questions. Findrix runs the other 44 for you and shows who AI names there instead, and which sites got them the spot.
Fix what AI gets wrong
AI states 53 facts about FlutterFlow. Findrix puts each one next to your own facts and writes the correction email for you to send.
Watch it move
In your inbox: a report after every scan and a monthly PDF for your team. An email when a fix worked or a rival overtakes you, and right away if your site blocks AI bots or goes down.
← Back to Low-code and no-code application development platforms in AustraliaRequest a correction or removal
Get FlutterFlow recommended by AISee what AI says about your company, who it names instead, and what to change so it names you.