AI Rankings · project and work management software · Australia
Linear, according to AI (October 2026)
When a buyer in Australia asked ChatGPT, Gemini or Google AI Mode for project and work management software, Linear came up in 12 of 182 answers. That puts it #12 of the 220 companies AI named in Australia.
In 10 of those 12 answers AI recommended it. In the other 2 it only mentioned it.
- 60 buyer questions
- 182 answers read
- 3 engines
Where you stand
Your totals across all 3 engines first, then the same numbers engine by engine. Rank is your place among the companies that engine named in Australia. Mention rate is the share of that engine’s answers that name you. Recommendation rate is the share of your mentions where you are put forward as a recommendation, not just named. Average position is the place you take in an answer that names you, 1 means first. Questions you appear in is how many of the 60 buyer questions named you at least once.
| Engine | Rank | Mention rate | Recommendation rate | Average position | Questions you appear in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All 3 engines | #12of 220 | 7% | 83% | 3.5 | 9 of 60 |
 ChatGPT | #11of 110 | 8% | 60% | 4.2 | 5 of 60 |
 Gemini | #14of 128 | 7% | 100% | 2.3 | 4 of 60 |
 Google AI Mode | #16of 100 | 5% | 100% | 4.0 | 3 of 60 |
ChatGPT names Linear most often, Google AI Mode least. Monday.com leads on ChatGPT. Asana leads on Gemini. Atlassian leads on Google AI Mode.
Named instead of you
The leader, the three named right above you, and you. Share of answers that name each one, overall and on each engine.
| Rank | company | Mention rate | ChatGPT | Gemini | Google AI Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monday.com76 answers ahead of you | 48% | 53% | 51% | 41% |
| 9 | Wrike8 answers ahead of you | 11% | 8% | 15% | 10% |
| 10 | Teamwork.com7 answers ahead of you | 11% | 15% | 7% | 10% |
| 11 | Notion4 answers ahead of you | 9% | 2% | 12% | 13% |
| 12 | Linearyou | 7% | 8% | 7% | 5% |
Notion is 4 answers ahead of you, Slack level with you.
See, question by question, who took the spot →In AI’s own words
How the engines described Linear when they named it, word for word, from the October 2026 answers.
…Polished project management ~US$55/mo Easiest sophisticated option Linear Product/engineering teams Varies Fantastic for software startups, less ideal company-wide Using current annual-billing…
It's much more opinionated around product development and tends to feel considerably cleaner than general-purpose tools.
Linear is built for high-performance remote and distributed squads.
AI states 18 facts about Linear
In the October 2026 answers, AI describes your company in 18 statements: 13 about the service, 3 about prices, 1 about other things and 1 about history.
Findrix checks each one against your own facts, statement by statement, and writes the correction email for you.
Check all 18 in Findrix →What to do with this report
Get named where you are not
Linear appeared in 9 of the 60 buyer questions. Findrix runs the other 51 for you and shows who AI names there instead, and which sites got them the spot.
Fix what AI gets wrong
AI states 18 facts about Linear. Findrix puts each one next to your own facts and writes the correction email for you to send.
Watch it move
In your inbox: a report after every scan and a monthly PDF for your team. An email when a fix worked or a rival overtakes you, and right away if your site blocks AI bots or goes down.
← Back to Project and work management software in AustraliaRequest a correction or removal
Get Linear recommended by AISee what AI says about your company, who it names instead, and what to change so it names you.