AI Rankings · website and content management systems · Australia
Joomla, according to AI (October 2026)
When a buyer in Australia asked ChatGPT, Gemini or Google AI Mode for website and content management systems, Joomla came up in 3 of 180 answers. That puts it #51 of the 243 companies AI named in Australia.
In 1 of those 3 answers AI recommended it. In the other 2 it only mentioned it.
- 60 buyer questions
- 180 answers read
- 3 engines
Where you stand
Your totals across all 3 engines first, then the same numbers engine by engine. Rank is your place among the companies that engine named in Australia. Mention rate is the share of that engine’s answers that name you. Recommendation rate is the share of your mentions where you are put forward as a recommendation, not just named. Average position is the place you take in an answer that names you, 1 means first. Questions you appear in is how many of the 60 buyer questions named you at least once.
| Engine | Rank | Mention rate | Recommendation rate | Average position | Questions you appear in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All 3 engines | #51of 243 | 2% | 33% | 3.7 | 3 of 60 |
 ChatGPT | #31of 117 | 3% | 50% | 4.0 | 2 of 60 |
 Gemini | #56of 141 | 2% | 0% | 3.0 | 1 of 60 |
 Google AI Mode | 0 of 60 |
ChatGPT names Joomla most often, Gemini least. WordPress leads on all 3 engines.
Named instead of you
The leader, the three named right above you, and you. Share of answers that name each one, overall and on each engine.
| Rank | company | Mention rate | ChatGPT | Gemini | Google AI Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WordPress89 answers ahead of you | 51% | 50% | 55% | 48% |
| 48 | Decap CMSlevel with you | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% |
| 49 | DSpacelevel with you | 2% | 3% | 2% | |
| 50 | Grav CMSlevel with you | 2% | 2% | 3% | |
| 51 | Joomlayou | 2% | 3% | 2% |
Grav CMS is level with you, Kinsta level with you.
See, question by question, who took the spot →In AI’s own words
How the engines described Joomla when they named it, word for word, from the October 2026 answers.
…overall WordPress ⭐⭐⭐⭐ SMBs, publishers, marketing sites Easiest Joomla ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Mid-sized sites Good alternative TYPO3 ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Large enterprise Powerful but more specialised Why I'd choose Drupal…
Joomla 2.0s 88.3% Good, but less compelling for new projects
Less common for small clubs now, but historically used by some larger regional associations because of their robust native user-access control levels (useful for separating public pages from "members-only" committee documents).
AI states 2 facts about Joomla
In the October 2026 answers, AI describes your company in 2 statements: 2 about the service.
Findrix checks each one against your own facts, statement by statement, and writes the correction email for you.
Check all 2 in Findrix →What to do with this report
Get named where you are not
Joomla appeared in 3 of the 60 buyer questions. Findrix runs the other 57 for you and shows who AI names there instead, and which sites got them the spot.
Fix what AI gets wrong
AI states 2 facts about Joomla. Findrix puts each one next to your own facts and writes the correction email for you to send.
Watch it move
In your inbox: a report after every scan and a monthly PDF for your team. An email when a fix worked or a rival overtakes you, and right away if your site blocks AI bots or goes down.
← Back to Website and content management systems in AustraliaRequest a correction or removal
Get Joomla recommended by AISee what AI says about your company, who it names instead, and what to change so it names you.